Difference between revisions of "Talk:Witches' Guild"

From Discworld MUD Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:Agree that this isn't really a 'witch command' per-se.  I've now removed the convince command from this page, and created a [[tricks]] article which contains all the convince syntax.  
 
:Agree that this isn't really a 'witch command' per-se.  I've now removed the convince command from this page, and created a [[tricks]] article which contains all the convince syntax.  
 
:--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 22:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 
:--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 22:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== "Fan" sites dissapearing ==
 +
Is it time to make an effort to preserve the knowledge? Albeit some of it obsolete by now...
 +
[[User:Chosig|Chosig]] ([[User talk:Chosig|talk]]) 19:06, 28 February 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 20:06, 28 February 2017

Convince

Yes, it is listed on that page, but it isn't a 'guild' command--rather, it's part of the Trick-making process, and only available when you have a bonded large hag stone in your inventory. That is, it's an item command usable only by witches, not a learnt command.

That it is listed here as a command doesn't bother me particularly (I don't think it should be listed as a command on the MUD page in the first place, though!), but it is my preference to include convince-related information under a Tricks page, rather than its own, and forward 'convince' to 'Tricks' (none of them exist yet anyway). I feel having a command-specific page implies that it is learnt.

-Taepha 23:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not fussed really, I presume the information will be contained in an article about hagstones anyway rather than a Convince article? Rehevkor 23:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Agree that this isn't really a 'witch command' per-se. I've now removed the convince command from this page, and created a tricks article which contains all the convince syntax.
--Chat 22:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

"Fan" sites dissapearing

Is it time to make an effort to preserve the knowledge? Albeit some of it obsolete by now... Chosig (talk) 19:06, 28 February 2017 (EST)