Difference between revisions of "Talk:Status/Archive"

From Discworld MUD Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Is is really worth archiving this?)
 
m (Protected "Talk:Status/Archive": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I think it would be better just to blank it every once in a while - "The mud is down" "Yes, the mud is down" "Is the mud down?" "It's up now" "Up for me too" are comments of zero value to anyone outside the timescale in which they occurred.
 
I think it would be better just to blank it every once in a while - "The mud is down" "Yes, the mud is down" "Is the mud down?" "It's up now" "Up for me too" are comments of zero value to anyone outside the timescale in which they occurred.
 
--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 17:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 17:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 +
:I suppose it's a bit pointless. If there's any historic information to be found here it can found on the history of the page itself. [[User:Rehevkor|Rehevkor]] <big>[[User talk:Rehevkor|<FONT COLOR="black">✉</FONT>]]</big> 04:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:28, 10 January 2011

Is it really worth archiving the contents of the status page?

I think it would be better just to blank it every once in a while - "The mud is down" "Yes, the mud is down" "Is the mud down?" "It's up now" "Up for me too" are comments of zero value to anyone outside the timescale in which they occurred. --Chat 17:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I suppose it's a bit pointless. If there's any historic information to be found here it can found on the history of the page itself. Rehevkor 04:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)