Difference between revisions of "Talk:Focus Tea Results"
From Discworld MUD Wiki
m (Created page with 'Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to ad...') |
(Please use existing research pages.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever | Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever | ||
| + | |||
| + | :We already have this, helpfully split into individual pages for each spell. For example, the Delusions of Grandeur research you've added would be better located at '[[Research:Delusions of Grandeur]]'. If you take a look at that page, you'll see that it already contains the research data imported from Clover's website (that's the beam.to/lawks one); the same has been applied to all other witch spells where possible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :All new research data is welcomed - you'll see there are several holes in the current data where we desperately need more information from witches with different research bonuses; however: | ||
| + | :*Please use the existing Research page framework, rather than creating new pages. | ||
| + | :*We've already got Clover's old data incorporated, so don't worry about trying to merge it in. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 17:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:14, 27 October 2010
Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever
- We already have this, helpfully split into individual pages for each spell. For example, the Delusions of Grandeur research you've added would be better located at 'Research:Delusions of Grandeur'. If you take a look at that page, you'll see that it already contains the research data imported from Clover's website (that's the beam.to/lawks one); the same has been applied to all other witch spells where possible.
- All new research data is welcomed - you'll see there are several holes in the current data where we desperately need more information from witches with different research bonuses; however:
- Please use the existing Research page framework, rather than creating new pages.
- We've already got Clover's old data incorporated, so don't worry about trying to merge it in.
- --Chat 17:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
