Difference between revisions of "Talk:Focus Tea Results"

From Discworld MUD Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Created page with 'Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to ad...')
 
(Please use existing research pages.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever
 
Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever
 +
 +
:We already have this, helpfully split into individual pages for each spell.  For example, the Delusions of Grandeur research you've added would be better located at '[[Research:Delusions of Grandeur]]'.  If you take a look at that page, you'll see that it already contains the research data imported from Clover's website (that's the beam.to/lawks one); the same has been applied to all other witch spells where possible.
 +
 +
:All new research data is welcomed - you'll see there are several holes in the current data where we desperately need more information from witches with different research bonuses; however:
 +
:*Please use the existing Research page framework, rather than creating new pages.
 +
:*We've already got Clover's old data incorporated, so don't worry about trying to merge it in.
 +
 +
:--[[User:Chat|Chat]] 17:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:14, 27 October 2010

Thistle: I decided why not put a little less visual and a bit more statistic version of the Spellcheck Project on the new Discworld mud Wiki. Hopefully people will continue to add any results they may acquire so as to have a more accurate Spellcheck Project then Ever

We already have this, helpfully split into individual pages for each spell. For example, the Delusions of Grandeur research you've added would be better located at 'Research:Delusions of Grandeur'. If you take a look at that page, you'll see that it already contains the research data imported from Clover's website (that's the beam.to/lawks one); the same has been applied to all other witch spells where possible.
All new research data is welcomed - you'll see there are several holes in the current data where we desperately need more information from witches with different research bonuses; however:
  • Please use the existing Research page framework, rather than creating new pages.
  • We've already got Clover's old data incorporated, so don't worry about trying to merge it in.
--Chat 17:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)