Difference between revisions of "Research:Judge/Quality"

Revision as of 19:16, 15 January 2011

Observations

• Success rate increases with ad.ev.we bonus.
• Success rates differ significantly between weapons; in general, 'better' weapons are harder to judge.
• ad.ev.we bonus doesn't seem to make any real difference to the actual results for a successful judge - it only seems to affect chance of success and how much information is displayed.
• There's zero variation in the overall quality and average damage characteristics (there's little variation in the ease-of-parrying stat too, but that's because it's maxing out at the top of its range).
• Ease of use and parrying scores are all currently near the top of their range, even for the fairly average long sword. This probably implies that these scores are factoring in the player's fi.me.x and fi.de.pa bonuses respectively - suggest someone with lower bonuses tries and sees if they get different data.
• Damage scores, however, are pretty low - perhaps these don't factor in anything other than the weapon's raw stats?

Data

The tables below show the raw data. In each case:

• The data is the result of 50 judge attempts on the weapon.
• The overall quality score is derived from {{wr-overall}}.
• The ease of use/parrying scores are derived from {{wr-ease}}.
• The damage scores are derived from {{wr-damage}}.
• A successful judge is one where you don't see 'but you're not sure' on the end of the first line. Please only allow successful judges to contribute to the scores.