Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Serpentes"

From Discworld MUD Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(suborder)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
::You'd need to ask Groth who did most of the bestiary, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpentes Serpentes] is the suborder for serpents. Either is good I guess. --[[User:Frazyl|Frazyl]] 21:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 
::You'd need to ask Groth who did most of the bestiary, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpentes Serpentes] is the suborder for serpents. Either is good I guess. --[[User:Frazyl|Frazyl]] 21:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::If Serpentes is the formal classification, I'm happy, I just wanted to make sure that a mis-spelling hadn't crept in (taxonomy of species really isn't my area of expertise) and although I found both serpentes and serpents in a dictionary, to my mind "serpents" was the expected spelling. [[User:Zexium|Zexium]] 23:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:22, 28 June 2012

Is there some glaringly obvious reason that I'm unaware of that we're using "serpentes" and not "serpents"? Zexium 16:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Not that I am aware of. Where were the classifications taken from in general, and are they important for anything (eg tanning or the like)? --Gunde 18:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
You'd need to ask Groth who did most of the bestiary, but Serpentes is the suborder for serpents. Either is good I guess. --Frazyl 21:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
If Serpentes is the formal classification, I'm happy, I just wanted to make sure that a mis-spelling hadn't crept in (taxonomy of species really isn't my area of expertise) and although I found both serpentes and serpents in a dictionary, to my mind "serpents" was the expected spelling. Zexium 23:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)